Pangaea-world.dk

Or players are just using bad macros... during a macro weekend.

Yeah, but what does it change?
People spend more money than before to insure their stuff?
Everyone does the same and then what?
PvP's more profitable than before?

Wear what you can afford changes to wear what you can afford to insure.

I don't see how that changes anything in PvP. Money sink, sure. Cure for PvP, no.

I know I sound like I'm always right, but that's only because I'm always right.

Honestly, players know best. They're the ones playing this game.

What you're suggesting here isn't a solution to PvP. It's nothing but a money sink.

Ares wrote:I'm just glad this isn't a player democracy

Even Hitler had heart.

The current concept is based on "you don't do religion damage, you don't receive religion damage vs. you do religion damage, you receive religion damage". Breaking that harmony isn't developing, it's taking two steps back. +1 on this. It's a logical and consistent dynamic. The suggestion ...

There's plenty of high-end super weapons hanging on peoples floors. They deserve to stay there, if there's no risk of losing them.

I don't see a problem with the current concept. You wear what you can afford to lose. If that isn't the case, that's your own problem.

Though I'd prefer "Infernal" over monstrous. Or have both, remove Vicious and no one will have their current virtue title changed. As such... Honorable...........200 Commendable......400 Admirable............800 Re(k)nowned.........1,600 Famed...............3,200 Noble.................6,4...

I seriously think this'll take some of the greed and whining out of PvP and make it a bit more fun. I'd see it vice versa. All you need is that one great weapon, lets say a blinding hally of vanquishing and give it to baba with 240 STR. People start one-dropping bada-bim-bada-bum and you're back to...

How I see it, everyone with over -52k would be set back to -52k. Regardless of Wille capping dying and poison to a certain point, negative virtue still remains easier and faster to achieve than positive virtue. In which case all Dread would remain Dread (if we're talking of option #1). I guess I pre...