Shard moments - present and the future

For general discussion concerning Pangaea

Moderator: Game Masters

User avatar
blckfire
Scripter
Posts: 470
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:12 pm

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by blckfire »

Akkarrin wrote:
40 piety should be earned, not just given by HP
Please please tell me these changes to religion will mean an end to piety timers, I don't know if I can go through that again..
We thought about reviewing the way piety is given but, if we want to put out a system that gives out piety automatically, until a certain point, it's going to take some time to figure it out.

Piety attributions are based in more than just IG actions that we could measure, they are also linked to Roleplay and that one is kinda hard to measure.

Nevertheless, I think something can be figured out to automatically attribute piety from 0-30/40... We have already discussed a lot about this and our thoughts were inconclusive, at the time, on how to approach this. Maybe we will review it when we are closer to religions being, once again, a reality.
Ert
Counselor
Posts: 460
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:18 pm
Location: Iceland
Contact:

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by Ert »

If you want you can have a brainstorming thread in the idea section for how it might work, maby someone has a idea that sounds good and would actually work.
Personally im in favor of changing the piety system itself since the difference between 10-20-30-40 piety alwais felt wierd to me. Especially if its gona be automatic i think a 0-100 progression would make more sense to me.. but thats up for deate, we could even have a poll about it.
User avatar
Maximilian Lhoth
Posts: 2871
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:05 am
Location: 378093000
Contact:

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by Maximilian Lhoth »

blckfire wrote:I really don't know where you get your numbers from... but, Pangaea has been in the steady 20 online after working hours and weekends. Imo these are pretty good numbers, all things considered. And, religions are not even up yet...
Many shards with high online count offer rewards for just being online for a long enough time, so Pangaea's 20 can't be compared to those. Pangaea's 20 is much better than their 200. Pangaea disconnects you if you just stand still. Also some shards offer rewards for clicking "vote" buttons, so if you play fair you won't be at the top of the lists.
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by Glarundis »

when's the ticket to change names gonna come?..
Akkarrin
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 2:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by Akkarrin »

Glarundis wrote:when's the ticket to change names gonna come?..
Please never, it would just get very confusing
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by Glarundis »

Akkarrin wrote:
Glarundis wrote:when's the ticket to change names gonna come?..
Please never, it would just get very confusing
why, do you wanna know exactly who's who? :D

i would want it, i have 2 chars which badly need a rename lol
Talerco Pious
Posts: 1122
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:05 am

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by Talerco Pious »

Any update?
I whine, therefore I am
User avatar
Ondoher
Posts: 1008
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:18 am
Location: Åbo
Contact:

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by Ondoher »

Image
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by Glarundis »

blckfire wrote:Just want to inform you now so that you guys don't start whining that we are the 15th and religions are not up.
not whining here :D
can we get a new eta though?
yuusou
Posts: 552
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:03 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Shard moments - present and the future

Post by yuusou »

We'll just blame it on Glar. It's usually his fault anyway.
Post Reply