Important: The Future of Pangaea

If you want to know the community’s opinion about a topic, make a poll here.

Moderator: Game Masters

What do you want to happen?

Find a new scripter and continue as we are
34
38%
Recreate Pangaea on a new RUNUO platform
45
50%
Shut her down
11
12%
 
Total votes: 90

Bestia Domare
Posts: 526
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:01 pm

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Bestia Domare »

if we decide to work on RunUO i know C# and can help with it potentially.
I think we should allow transferring over of characters too, youll lose players if you dont allow it.
Iktomi or Dante, message me on icq. I have some friends who run a hosting service, might be able to reduce costs.

i dont want to see pang shut down.

but as far as staying with POL or RUNUO, i think we should get the shard running smoothly and give RunUO a shot.
for the current shard, i think we should remove the mayor system or just put 99999999999999999 money in each town and lock it for now because its making ghost towns which isnt helping our situation.

deciding on RunUO or not i guess we need to assess the situation.
How much time will it take?
How many people are willing to help, how many hours can they contribute?
Does it cost more/less?
How much different would the game be?
Last edited by Bestia Domare on Mon Apr 28, 2014 11:29 am, edited 2 times in total.
Please send inquiries to the Pigeon-Post coordinates of 670 442 981
User avatar
Glarundis
Posts: 5741
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Glarundis »

i agree a bit with dargon in terms of losing everything you've worked for.
i don't mind an item wipe that much, but dammit...only being able to transfer 1 char?some ppl would most definately have to transfer all 5 to not lose something massive. i'm guessing even the average player would have atleast 3 well trained chars
Talerco Pious
Posts: 1122
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:05 am

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Talerco Pious »

It's a bigger job to re-create the shard than most of the ppl realize, been tried before and we all know how it's gone
I whine, therefore I am
User avatar
Daren Priesten
Posts: 1247
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:24 pm

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Daren Priesten »

Point 6 from Iktomi sounds the best for me. If we need to go to RUNUO from POL to enhance player base and add-on then so be it. It wouldn't be the first item-wipe.

As long as we can change to RUNUO and keep all our stats/skills/characters (and optionally start creating fresh ones) then I see that as the best option.

I leave for 3 days to go camping and this is what I come back to :cry:
User avatar
Iktomi
Posts: 1645
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:30 pm
Contact:

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Iktomi »

I think a full item wipe is almost guaranteed (our economy is fucked, and a wipe will kind of be necessary if we want to have any chance of creating a new more balanced economy).

That said, full character transfer is entirely likely (if not probable). I like the idea of wiping murder counts and a free rename for every character... giving people a chance to start new (but not new).
Hilda
Posts: 776
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:42 am
Contact:

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Hilda »

I would be willing to help with the coding if the RunUO option gets chosen. I am 99.87% confident I am better than 98.64% of monkeys. (I think RunUO is in C#, am I right?)
cridan
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:45 pm
Contact:

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by cridan »

I would be happy to move over if we could take atleast 3 chars over ot more with us
Cridan sherrod - archer
peter dunchirc - druid
lisa sherrod highten tamer
john shaft - priest

bird number- 220878142
Arden Darkfall
Posts: 407
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:13 am

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Arden Darkfall »

Realistically, how many scripting hours are we talking about?
User avatar
Mike
Posts: 2465
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Mike »

I'd go with RunUO. A solid back-end platform is the foundation of a successful endeavour. POL being outdated doesn't just mean its old, it means we can't get people who have the knowledge and motivation to work with it since there's no regrowth of POL programmers. Being stuck in a no-development zone is bad news, especially considering we have a bunch of things that need fixing.
"last i knew it was illegal to hate someone" Richard Mota
User avatar
Cirius Do'Brim
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:22 pm

Re: Important: The Future of Pangaea

Post by Cirius Do'Brim »

Sounds like it's time for a comeback.
Post Reply